Meeting at the Berlin residence of Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck in 1884
AN ONLINE PLATFORM THAT PROVIDES EDUCATIONAL CONTENT,SYLLABUSES, STUDY NOTES/ MATERIALS ,PAST PAPERS, QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR THE STUDENTS,FORM I--VI ,RESITTERS,QT, ADULT LEARNERS, COLLEGE STUDENTS, PUPILS, TEACHERS, PARENTS,TEACHERS OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA AND WORLDWIDE.YOU ARE WELCOME TO SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND IDEAS.ENJOY MASATU BLOG.YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.YOU CAN ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE. "LEARN.REVISE.DISCUSS".Anytime, Anywhere.
- HOME
- UTAKUZAJE UWEZO WAKO WA LUGHA ?
- MBINU ZA KUSOMA NA KUFAULU MITIHANI
- HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR MEMORY
- ONLINE LEARNING & DISTANCE LEARNING ( E--LEA...
- O-LEVEL & A--LEVEL SYLLABUS
- FORM FOUR ( F 4 )--SUBJECTS---TANZANIA
- FORM TWO ( F 2 )--SUBJECTS---TANZANIA
- FORM ONE ( F 1 )-- SUBJECTS---TANZANIA
- FORM FIVE( F 5 ) AND SIX ( F 6 )--SUBJECTS ---TANZANIA
- FORM THREE ( F 3 ) SUBJECTS----TANZANIA
- STANDARD 1 & 2 SUBJECTS / MASOMO YA DARASA 1 & 2-...
- STANDARD 3 & 4 SUBJECTS / MASOMO YA DARASA 3 & 4...
- STANDARD 5, 6 & 7 SUBJECTS / MASOMO YA DARASA...
Thursday, October 16, 2014
EUROPEAN CLAIMS IN AFRICA , 1913.
European claims in Africa, 1913. Modern-day boundaries, largely a legacy of the colonial era, are shown.
Belgium Germany Spain France
Britain Italy Portugal Independent
Belgium Germany Spain France
Britain Italy Portugal Independent
Q. Analyse six terms of agreement of the 1884---1885 Berlin Conference.
ANSWER
The Berlin Conference of 1884–85, also known
as the Congo Conference (German: Kongokonferenz)
or West Africa Conference (Westafrika-Konferenz), regulated European colonisation and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism period, and coincided with
Germany's sudden emergence as an imperial power. Called for by Portugal
and organized by Otto von Bismarck,
first Chancellor
of Germany, its outcome, the General Act of the Berlin Conference,
can be seen as the formalization of the Scramble for Africa.
The conference ushered in a period of heightened colonial activity by European
powers, which eliminated or overrode most existing forms of African autonomy and self-governance.
Berlin
Conference of 1884-1885 to Divide Africa
In 1884 at the request of Portugal, German
Chancellor Otto von Bismark called together the major western powers of the
world to negotiate questions and end confusion over the control of Africa.
Bismark appreciated the opportunity to expand Germany's sphere of influence
over Africa and desired to force Germany's rivals to struggle with one another
for territory.The Berlin Conference was Africa's undoing in more ways than one. The colonial powers superimposed their domains on the African Continent. By the time Africa regained its independence after the late 1950s, the realm had acquired a legacy of political fragmentation that could neither be eliminated nor made to operate satisfactorily. The African politico-geographical map is thus a permanent liability that resulted from the three months of ignorant, greedy acquisitiveness during a period when Europe's search for minerals and markets had become insatiable.
At the time of the conference, 80% of Africa remained under Native Traditional and local control.
Fourteen countries were represented by a plethora of ambassadors when the conference opened in Berlin on November 15, 1884 by the imperial chancellor and architect of the German Empire, Otto von Bismarck to settle the political partitioning of Africa. Bismarck wanted not only to expand German spheres of influence in Africa but also to play off Germany's colonial rivals against one another to the Germans' advantage. The countries represented at the time included Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden-Norway (unified from 1814-1905), Turkey, and the United States of America. Of these fourteen nations, France, Germany, Great Britain, and Portugal were the major players in the conference, controlling most of colonial Africa at the time.
The initial task of the conference was to agree that the Congo River and Niger River mouths and basins would be considered neutral and open to trade. Despite its neutrality, part of the Kongo Basin became a personal Kingdom (private property) for Belgium's King Leopold II and under his rule, over half of the region's population died.
At the time of the conference, only the coastal areas of Africa were colonized by the European powers. At the Berlin Conference the European colonial powers scrambled to gain control over the Interior of the Continent. The conference lasted until February 26, 1885 - a three month period where colonial powers haggled over geometric boundaries in the interior of the continent, disregarding the cultural and linguistic boundaries already established by the Native Indigenous African population. What ultimately resulted was a hodgepodge of geometric boundaries that divided Africa into fifty irregular countries. This new map of the continent was superimposed over the one thousand Indigenous cultures and regions of Africa. The new countries lacked rhyme or reason and divided coherent groups of people and merged together disparate groups who really did not get along.
Following the conference, the give and take continued. By 1914, the conference participants had fully divided Africa among themselves into fifty unnatural and artificial States.
The Act allotted "spheres of influence" to the relevant powers and established the Kongo basin as the Kongo Free State under the sovereignty of Leopold II in his personal capacity as head (and chief financial backer) of the private International Kongo Association. Some of the main provisions of the Act are as follows; note in particular the doctrine of "effective occupation" as prescribed in Art. XXXV.
The
Berlin Conference:
The
General Act of Feb. 26, 1885
Chap.
I [relating to the Kongo River Basin and adjacent territories] I. The trade of all nations shall enjoy complete freedom
II. All flags, without distinction of nationality, shall have free access to the whole of the coast-line of the territories . . .
III. Goods of whatever origin, imported into these regions, under whatsoever flag, by sea or river, or overland, shall be subject to no other taxes than such as may be levied as fair compensation for expenditure in the interests of trade . . .
IV. Merchandise imported into these regions shall remain free from import and transit duties [subject to review after 20 years]
V. No power which exercises or shall exercise sovereign rights in the . . regions shall be allowed to grant therein a monopoly or favour of any kind in matters of trade...
VI. All the powers exercising sovereign rights or influence in the aforesaid territories bind themselves to watch over the preservation of the native tribes, and to care for the improvement of the conditions of their moral and material well-being and to help in suppressing slavery, and especially the Slave Trade. They shall, without distinction of creed or nation, protect and favour all religious, scientific, or charitable institutions and undertakings created and organized for the above ends, or which aim at instructing the natives and bringing home to them the blessings of civilization.
Christian missionaries, scientists, and explorers, with their followers, property, and collections, shall likewise be the objects of especial protection.
Freedom of conscience and religious toleration are expressly guaranteed to the natives, no less than to subjects and to foreigners . . .
Chap. II Documents relative to the Slave Trade
IX. ............the Powers which do or shall exercise sovereign rights or influence in the territories forming the .. basin of the Congo declare that these territories may not serve as a market or means of transit for the trade in slaves, of whatever race they may be. Each of the Powers binds itself to employ all the means at its disposal for putting an end to this trade and for punishing those who engage in it.
Chap. IV Act of Navigation for the Kongo
XIII. The navigation of the Kongo, without excepting any of its branches or outlets, is, and shall remain, free for the merchant ships of all nations equally . . . the subjects and flags of all nations shall in all respects be treated on a footing of perfect equality . . . no exclusive privilege of navigation will be conceded to Companies, Corporations, or private persons whatsoever . . .
Chap. V Act of Navigation for the Niger.
XXVI. The navigation of the (River) Niger, without excepting any of its branches and outlets, is and shall remain entirely free for the merchant ships of all nations equally . . .[both Britain and France which had parts of the region of the Niger under protectorate status also undertook to apply the principle of free trade in their territories]
Chap. VI [Regarding new occupations on the coasts of Africa]
XXXIV. Any power which henceforth takes possession of a tract of land on the coasts of the African Continent outside of its present possessions, or which, being hitherto without such possessions, shall acquire them and assume a protectorate. . . shall accompany either act with a notification thereof, addressed to the other Signatory Powers of the present Act, in order to enable them to protest against the same if there exists any grounds for their doing so.
XXXV. The Signatory Powers of the present Act recognize the obligation to insure the establishment of authority in the regions occupied by them on the coasts of the African Continent sufficient to protect existing rights, and, as the case may be, freedom of trade and of transit under the conditions aggreed upon.
XXXVII. The Powers signatory to the present general Act reserve to themselves the right of eventually, by mutual agreement, introducing therein modifications or improvements the utility of which has been shown by experience ......................................
Done at Berlin, the 26th day of February, 1885.
Q.Elaborate eight factors accounting for the rise of zulu state.
ANSWER:
INTRODUCTION
The Zulu Kingdom, sometimes referred
to as the Zulu Empire (or Zululand) was a monarchy in Southern Africa that extended along the
coast of the Indian Ocean
from the Tugela River in
the south to Pongola River
in the north.
The small kingdom grew to dominate much of
what is today KwaZulu-Natal in
Southern Africa, but when it came into conflict with the British Empire in the 1870s during the Anglo-Zulu War, it was defeated despite an
early Zulu victory
in the war. The area was subsequently absorbed into the Colony of Natal and later became part of
the Union of South
Africa.
Shaka
and the Rise of the Zulu State.
By the mid-1820s, Shaka ruled a kingdom of more than 100,000 people with a standing army of 40,000 men. He centralized power in the person of the king and his court, collected tribute from regional chiefs, and placed regiments throughout his state to ensure compliance with his orders. These regiments also looked after the royal herds and carried out public works. Women, too, were incorporated into their own age regiments, which were paired with male regiments to provide food and other services for the soldiers. Shaka forbade members of these regiments to marry, however, until they had completed their military service. For men this meant their late thirties, and for women their late twenties. Only after marriage could men and women leave their regiments and set up their own homesteads. Shaka fostered a new national identity by stressing the Zuluness of the state. All subjects of the state became Zulu and owed the king their personal allegiance. Zulu traditions of origin became the national traditions of the state. Customary Nguni festivals, such as planting and harvest celebrations, became occasions on which Shaka gathered vast numbers of his people and extolled the virtues of the state. Through such means, Shaka developed a Zulu consciousness that transcended the original identities and lineages of the various peoples who were his subjects. During most of the 1820s, Shaka consolidated his power through a series of wars against neighboring peoples. His armies raided for cattle and food; they attacked any who challenged the authority of the Zulu monarch; and they extended the limits of Shaka's realm north to the borders of present-day Mozambique, west across the Drakensberg Mountains, and south to the margins of the area that would later become the Transkei homeland. He also welcomed British traders to his kingdom and sent diplomatic emissaries to the British king. Shaka was assassinated at the height of his powers in 1828 and was succeeded by Dingane, his half-brother and one of the assassins. Dingane was a much less accomplished ruler than the founder of the Zulu state. His weak claim to the throne and his constant fear of assassination made him a despotic ruler. Dingane maintained the centralized and militarized organization of the Zulu state and sent his armies out on raiding missions. Victories, however, were few because of the growing strength of neighboring African kingdoms, and by the end of the 1830s Dingane's hold on power was being challenged by internal discontent and external threats. |
Modern Zululand
The area is currently part of the Republic of
South Africa as KwaZulu-Natal,
one of the country's nine provinces, and a large portion of the territory is
made up of wildlife reserves and a major contributing source of income is
derived from tourism – the area is known for its beautiful savanna covered hills and stunning views.
It is home to a WWF
Black Rhinoceros reintroduction project
known as "The Black Rhino Range Expansion Project" within the Zululand
Rhino Reserve (ZRR). The ZRR is a 20,000 hectare reserve consisting of 15
individually owned farms that have lowered their fences in order to further
conservation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)